<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>LLM Benchmarks - Developers Digest</title>
    <link>https://www.developersdigest.tech/blog/tags/llm-benchmarks</link>
    <description>Articles about LLM Benchmarks on Developers Digest</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 03:11:18 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.developersdigest.tech/blog/tags/llm-benchmarks/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[GLM 5.2 Outperforms Claude Code on Semgrep's IDOR Vulnerability Benchmarks]]></title>
      <link>https://www.developersdigest.tech/blog/glm-52-beats-claude-semgrep-idor-benchmarks</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.developersdigest.tech/blog/glm-52-beats-claude-semgrep-idor-benchmarks</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Semgrep's security research team benchmarked LLMs on IDOR vulnerability detection. The open-weight GLM 5.2 beat Claude Code by 7 points at roughly one-sixth the cost.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>News</category>
      <category>Hacker News</category>
      <category>AI</category>
      <category>Security</category>
      <category>LLM Benchmarks</category>
      <category>Open Source</category>
      <enclosure url="https://www.developersdigest.tech/images/blog/glm-52-beats-claude-semgrep-idor-benchmarks/hero.webp" type="image/webp" />
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>