Skip to main content
Watch: I Built an AI App Without Leaving Databricks

Benchmark leaderboard - 25 entries on 2 boards

tau-bench and tau2-bench leaderboard

tau-bench measures how well AI agents converse with users, call tools, retrieve knowledge, and follow policy across enterprise customer-service domains, in text and voice. As of October 17, 2026, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B (Alibaba Cloud) ranks first on the tau2-bench (Overall) board with 87.9% and Qwen 3.8 Max (Qwen) ranks first on the tau3-Banking (tau-knowledge) board with 55.2%.

Last verified from taubench.com. Read the caveats

This page covers 2 separate boards: tau2-bench (Overall) and tau3-Banking (tau-knowledge). Each is scored on its own terms, so compare rows only within the same board.

tau2-bench (Overall)

8 entries, in the board's order

tau2-bench (Overall) entries. Rows are in the source's own order; select a column header to sort.
1Qwen3.5-397B-A17B (Alibaba Cloud)

tau2-bench leaderboard, Overall pass^1 = mean of retail 84.43 / airline 81.5 / telecom 97.81; standard submission by Sierra; reasoning effort: enabled; user simulator gpt-5.2; verified; rank #1 of 8

Official leaderboard

taubench.com

87.9%
2Claude Opus 4.5 (Anthropic)

tau2-bench leaderboard, Overall pass^1 = mean of retail 79.61 / airline 84 / telecom 92.32; standard submission by Sierra; reasoning effort: high; user simulator gpt-5.2; verified; rank #2 of 8

Official leaderboard

taubench.com

85.3%
3GPT-5.2 (OpenAI)

tau2-bench leaderboard, Overall pass^1 = mean of retail 81.58 / airline 83 / telecom 89.69; standard submission by Sierra; reasoning effort: high; user simulator gpt-5.2; verified; rank #3 of 8

Official leaderboard

taubench.com

84.8%
4Gemini 3 Flash (Google)

tau2-bench leaderboard, Overall pass^1 = mean of retail 76.75 / airline 82.5 / telecom 91.23; standard submission by Sierra; reasoning effort: high; user simulator gpt-5.2; verified; rank #4 of 8

Official leaderboard

taubench.com

83.5%
5Gemini 3 Pro (Google)

tau2-bench leaderboard, Overall pass^1 = mean of retail 75.88 / airline 80.5 / telecom 91.01; standard submission by Sierra; reasoning effort: high; user simulator gpt-5.2; verified; rank #5 of 8

Official leaderboard

taubench.com

82.5%
6GLM-5 (Zhipu AI)

tau2-bench leaderboard, Overall pass^1 = mean of retail 73.68 / airline 82.5 / telecom 86.84; standard submission by Sierra; reasoning effort: enabled; user simulator gpt-5.2; verified; rank #6 of 8

Official leaderboard

taubench.com

81.0%
7Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic)

tau2-bench leaderboard, Overall pass^1 = mean of retail 72.37 / airline 72 / telecom 84.87; standard submission by Sierra; reasoning effort: enabled; user simulator gpt-5.2; verified; rank #7 of 8

Official leaderboard

taubench.com

76.4%
8GPT-5.2 (OpenAI)

tau2-bench leaderboard, Overall pass^1 = mean of retail 75 / airline 52.5 / telecom 57.24; standard submission by Sierra; reasoning effort: none; user simulator gpt-5.2; verified; rank #8 of 8

Official leaderboard

taubench.com

61.6%

tau3-Banking (tau-knowledge)

17 entries, in the board's order

tau3-Banking (tau-knowledge) entries. Rows are in the source's own order; select a column header to sort.
1Qwen 3.8 Max (Qwen)

tau3-Banking leaderboard (default tab on taubench.com), banking_knowledge pass^1; standard submission by Sierra; reasoning effort: xhigh; retrieval config: alltools; user simulator gpt-5.2; rank #1 of standard submissions

Official leaderboard

taubench.com

55.2%
2Claude Opus 5 (Anthropic)

tau3-Banking leaderboard, banking_knowledge pass^1; standard submission by Sierra; reasoning effort: max; retrieval config: alltools; user simulator gpt-5.2; rank #2

Official leaderboard

taubench.com

48.7%
3Grok 4.5 (xAI)

tau3-Banking leaderboard, banking_knowledge pass^1; standard submission by Sierra; reasoning effort: high; retrieval config: alltools; user simulator gpt-5.2; rank #3

Official leaderboard

taubench.com

47.9%
4GPT-5.6-sol (OpenAI)

tau3-Banking leaderboard, banking_knowledge pass^1; standard submission by Sierra; reasoning effort: xhigh; retrieval config: alltools; user simulator gpt-5.2; rank #4

Official leaderboard

taubench.com

46.9%
5GPT-5.5 (OpenAI)

tau3-Banking leaderboard, banking_knowledge pass^1; standard submission by Sierra; reasoning effort: xhigh; retrieval config: alltools; user simulator gpt-5.2; rank #5

Official leaderboard

taubench.com

44.6%
6Muse Spark 1.1 (Meta)

tau3-Banking leaderboard, banking_knowledge pass^1; standard submission by Sierra; reasoning effort: xhigh; retrieval config: alltools; user simulator gpt-5.2; rank #6

Official leaderboard

taubench.com

40.5%
7Claude Opus 4.7 (Anthropic)

tau3-Banking leaderboard, banking_knowledge pass^1; standard submission by Sierra; reasoning effort: max; retrieval config: alltools; user simulator gpt-5.2; rank #7

Official leaderboard

taubench.com

40.2%
8Claude Opus 4.8 (Anthropic)

tau3-Banking leaderboard, banking_knowledge pass^1; standard submission by Sierra; reasoning effort: max; retrieval config: alltools; user simulator gpt-5.2; rank #8 (tied 39.7 with Claude Fable 5)

Official leaderboard

taubench.com

39.7%
9Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic)

tau3-Banking leaderboard, banking_knowledge pass^1; standard submission by Sierra; reasoning effort: max; retrieval config: alltools; user simulator gpt-5.2; rank #9 (tied 39.7 with Claude Opus 4.8)

Official leaderboard

taubench.com

39.7%
10GPT-5.4 (OpenAI)

tau3-Banking leaderboard, banking_knowledge pass^1; standard submission by Sierra; reasoning effort: xhigh; retrieval config: alltools; user simulator gpt-5.2; rank #10

Official leaderboard

taubench.com

39.4%
11Kimi K3 (Moonshot AI)

tau3-Banking leaderboard, banking_knowledge pass^1; standard submission by Sierra; reasoning effort: max; retrieval config: alltools; user simulator gpt-5.2; rank #11 (tied 37.1 with GLM-5.2)

Official leaderboard

taubench.com

37.1%
12GLM-5.2 (Z.ai)

tau3-Banking leaderboard, banking_knowledge pass^1; standard submission by Sierra; reasoning effort: xhigh; retrieval config: alltools; user simulator gpt-5.2; rank #12 (tied 37.1 with Kimi K3)

Official leaderboard

taubench.com

37.1%
13GPT-5.2 (OpenAI)

tau3-Banking leaderboard, banking_knowledge pass^1; standard submission by Sierra; reasoning effort: high; retrieval config: alltools; user simulator gpt-5.2; rank #13

Official leaderboard

taubench.com

32.2%
14Gemini 3 Flash (Google)

tau3-Banking leaderboard, banking_knowledge pass^1; standard submission by Sierra; reasoning effort: high; retrieval config: terminal; user simulator gpt-5.2; rank #14 (tied 27.3 with Claude Opus 4.6)

Official leaderboard

taubench.com

27.3%
15Claude Opus 4.6 (Anthropic)

tau3-Banking leaderboard, banking_knowledge pass^1; standard submission by Sierra; reasoning effort: max; retrieval config: alltools; user simulator gpt-5.2; rank #15 (tied 27.3 with Gemini 3 Flash)

Official leaderboard

taubench.com

27.3%
16Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (Google)

tau3-Banking leaderboard, banking_knowledge pass^1; standard submission by Sierra; reasoning effort: high; retrieval config: alltools; user simulator gpt-5.2; rank #16

Official leaderboard

taubench.com

26.0%
17Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic)

tau3-Banking leaderboard, banking_knowledge pass^1; standard submission by Sierra; reasoning effort: enabled; retrieval config: terminal; user simulator gpt-5.2; rank #17

Official leaderboard

taubench.com

25.3%

About this board

  • The current tau2-bench Overall board (retail + airline + telecom, standard submissions, non-legacy, as of 2026-10-17) lists only 8 entries, so a top 25 cannot be filled from it. The other 17 entries come from the tau3-Banking (tau-knowledge) board on the same official site. Each entry's board label says which board it is from, and the two scores are not comparable.
  • Newer frontier models (Claude Opus 5, Claude Fable 5, Claude Opus 4.6/4.7/4.8, GPT-5.4/5.5/5.6-sol, Grok 4.5, Kimi K3, GLM-5.2, Qwen 3.8 Max, Muse Spark 1.1, Inkling, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview) have only banking_knowledge results in the official submissions. They have no retail/airline/telecom tau2-bench Overall score on the official leaderboard.
  • Hidden by default and not included: custom-scaffold submissions (Distyl ButtonAgent, banking 31.2%; RAFT-30B-A3B by NEU, retail only 82.46), legacy tau-bench v1 submissions (16 entries, not directly comparable because of task fixes), and the tau3-Voice board (24 voice submissions).
  • Scores are from taubench.com/submissions/manifest.json and the per-submission submission.json files in github.com/sierra-research/tau2-bench at web/leaderboard/public/submissions (commit 96a3ef92329baf908ffe9dfe188cea34e8701d2a, 2026-10-15). The live manifest was fetched on 2026-10-17 and matched the repo. The board's Overall is computed as the mean of the three domain pass^1 values, and each score is formatted with toFixed(1), the same way the site renders it. Each entry's date is the submission date.

FAQ

What does tau-bench and tau2-bench measure?

tau-bench measures how well AI agents converse with users, call tools, retrieve knowledge, and follow policy across enterprise customer-service domains, in text and voice. This page covers 2 separate boards: tau2-bench (Overall) and tau3-Banking (tau-knowledge). Each is scored on its own terms, so compare rows only within the same board.

Which model leads tau-bench and tau2-bench?

As of October 17, 2026, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B (Alibaba Cloud) ranks first on the tau2-bench (Overall) board with 87.9% and Qwen 3.8 Max (Qwen) ranks first on the tau3-Banking (tau-knowledge) board with 55.2%. That is the board's own order, not a Developers Digest ranking.

Where do these tau-bench and tau2-bench scores come from?

All 25 entries come from the official leaderboard at taubench.com. Every entry links to its source, which was read on October 17, 2026, and lists the setting it was run under.

Sources

Last verified . Each row links to the page its score was copied from.

Newsletter

Get new benchmark results as they land

One email per week. New model releases, the leaderboard moves that matter and what they mean for what you build.