Codeburn: The First TUI That Actually Shows Where Your Claude Max Subscription Is Going

Last updated: May 19, 2026

Source links#

This page is grounded in the public Codeburn GitHub repo, Anthropic pricing, Claude Code documentation, and Cursor pricing. For broader tool budgeting, use the AI coding tools pricing guide and the AI coding tools pricing comparison.

If you are evaluating which tool to pay for next:

• Start with the pricing hub and the AI coding tools pricing comparison.
• If you are choosing between major coding agents, use the comparison hub.

Official Sources#

Use this page as the practical overview, then verify any plan or pricing detail against the official sources before acting on it.

The question Claude Max does not answer#

If you are on a Claude Max subscription, you have a cap and a usage bar. What you do not have is a breakdown. You cannot see which project ate the most tokens this week, which agent loop ran hot at 2am, or how many dollars of inference you would have paid for if you were on pay-as-you-go. The bar just creeps toward full and then resets.

Codeburn from Agent Seal is the first tool that tries to answer that question directly. It is a terminal UI that reads the local session logs from Claude Code and Cursor and renders them as a live dashboard of token spend, cost estimates, and per-project breakdowns. The repo gained traction quickly, which usually means a tool landed on a real, widely felt pain point.

This post is a look at what codeburn actually does, where the data comes from, and why it is suddenly the one tool a lot of Claude Code users wish they had installed three months ago.

What codeburn shows you#

Codeburn is a TUI, meaning it runs inside your terminal and renders panels of data that update as you work. It is not a hosted dashboard. There is no account, no login, no telemetry leaving your machine. It parses the session and usage files that Claude Code and Cursor already write to your local disk and surfaces them as one coherent view.

The main panels are:

• Token spend by model. Sonnet versus Opus versus Haiku, broken down by input, output, cache read, and cache write tokens. If you have ever wondered whether your agent is actually hitting the cache the way you hoped, this is the first place you can see it.
• Cost estimate in dollars. Codeburn applies Anthropic's published per-token rates to your session data and tells you what the equivalent pay-as-you-go bill would have been. On a Max plan you do not pay that number. But seeing it is clarifying. It turns an abstract usage bar into a concrete receipt.
• Per-project and per-session breakdowns. Which repo burned the most tokens this week? Which session was the most expensive? Which day of the month is your heaviest? The TUI lets you filter and sort.
• Cursor usage alongside Claude Code. If you use both, codeburn merges them into one view. That alone is a small win if you have been juggling two separate mental budgets.

None of this data is new. It has always been sitting on your disk. Codeburn is the first tool to make reading it trivial.

Why this tool landed so hard#

A week-one star count in the thousands is rare. It usually means the maintainer either has a large audience already, or the tool solves a problem that a lot of people were actively Googling for. Codeburn is closer to the second case. The Claude Code subreddit and developer Twitter have been full of "where is my Max subscription actually going" posts for months. Anthropic's usage page shows you a bar. It does not show you the breakdown.

There is a second reason codeburn resonates, and it connects directly to the over-editing essay that is making the rounds right now. When models make fifty-line diffs for one-character bugs, every one of those extra lines is tokens. When an agent loops on a test that is failing for environmental reasons and re-reads the same files twenty times, that is tokens. When Claude Code opens a file you did not ask it to open because it wants to "understand the context," that is tokens.

The over-editing post mentions "$50 of tokens burned" on what should have been a one-line fix. That number is not theoretical. It is exactly the kind of number codeburn is built to surface. Before codeburn, you could feel that a session went long. You could not point at a line item that said "this project, this day, this model, this many dollars." Now you can.

What codeburn is not#

Worth being honest about the limits.

Codeburn is a viewer, not a controller. It does not stop a runaway session, throttle your agent, or alert you when you cross a threshold. If Claude Code is in a loop at 3am, codeburn will show you the damage after the fact. It will not intervene. That is a feature a competing tool or a future version could add, but it is not here today.

Codeburn also relies on the structure of local log files that Anthropic and Cursor can change without notice. If either vendor reorganizes their session format, the tool will need an update to keep parsing correctly. This is the usual tradeoff for any tool built on top of logs it does not own. The project is active enough that this will probably get fixed quickly when it happens, but it is a real dependency.

Cost estimates are also exactly that: estimates. Anthropic's per-token rates can change, and the tool needs to keep up. The dollar numbers codeburn shows are useful as signal, not as an audit.

Who should install it#

If you have a Claude Max subscription and you have ever wondered where the hours went, the answer is yes. Install it. The feedback loop of seeing your spend in a TUI next to your editor is small in effort and large in payoff. You start noticing which kinds of prompts are cheap and which are expensive. You start noticing when an agent goes off the rails and eats ten thousand tokens re-reading the same three files. Awareness is the first step toward changing the behavior.

If you are on a team, the case is stronger. Shared projects with multiple engineers using Claude Code benefit from the per-project view. You can see which repos are heavy users, which are efficient, and have a concrete starting point for a conversation about agent discipline.

If you are pay-as-you-go, codeburn is closer to necessary. The cost panel is not a what-if anymore. It is the actual invoice forming in real time.

The bigger pattern#

What codeburn represents is worth naming. We are moving from the era of "AI coding tools exist" into the era of "AI coding tools have an observability problem." Models are fast. Models loop. Models over-edit. Models read files they do not need to read. All of this shows up on your token bill, and for a long time the bill has been a black box.

Tools like codeburn are the first wave of making that box transparent. The next wave will probably be alerting, throttling, and policy. Team admins will want to set budgets per project. Solo developers will want a hard stop when a session crosses a threshold. The building blocks are the same log files codeburn is already reading.

For now, install it. Watch the numbers for a week. You will learn more about your own workflow than any productivity article can teach you.

Codeburn is on GitHub at github.com/getagentseal/codeburn.

FAQ#

What is Codeburn?#

Codeburn is an open-source terminal UI (TUI) dashboard that reads local session logs from Claude Code and Cursor to display token usage, cost estimates, and per-project breakdowns. It runs entirely on your machine with no external telemetry.

Does Codeburn work with Claude Max subscriptions?#

Yes. Codeburn parses the same usage data Claude Code writes locally regardless of your subscription tier. On Max, the cost panel shows what you would have paid at pay-as-you-go rates - useful for understanding which projects burn the most tokens.

Can Codeburn stop a runaway Claude Code session?#

No. Codeburn is a viewer, not a controller. It shows you the damage after the fact but does not throttle or alert during a session. That feature may come in a future version or competing tool.

Does Codeburn support Cursor alongside Claude Code?#

Yes. Codeburn merges usage data from both Claude Code and Cursor into a single dashboard view. If you use both tools, you get one unified picture of your token spend.

Is the cost estimate Codeburn shows accurate?#

It is an estimate based on Anthropic's published per-token rates. It is not an invoice. Rates can change, and the tool needs updates to stay current. Treat the dollar numbers as directional signal, not as audit-grade accounting.

Do I need an account or login to use Codeburn?#

No. Codeburn is fully local. It reads log files from your disk and renders them in the terminal. There is no hosted service, no account, and no data leaving your machine.

Will Codeburn break if Anthropic changes their log format?#

Possibly. Codeburn depends on the structure of local session files that Anthropic controls. If the format changes, the tool will need an update. The project is actively maintained, so fixes typically land quickly.

Is Codeburn useful for teams?#

Yes. The per-project view lets teams see which repositories are heavy consumers, which sessions were expensive, and opens a concrete conversation about agent discipline and cost awareness.

If Codeburn is part of your tool-selection process, read these next:

• Pricing hub
• AI coding tools pricing 2026
• Claude Code usage limits playbook
• Claude Code vs Cursor (side-by-side)
• Claude Code vs Codex (side-by-side)