AI Coding Tools Pricing Comparison 2026

The AI coding tool market has more options and more pricing complexity than ever. Some tools are free. Some cost $200 a month. Some charge per task or per credit. Figuring out what you actually get for your money means digging through pricing pages, fair-use policies, and fine print that changes quarterly. If you are choosing by workflow first, the AI coding tools comparison matrix is the companion piece to keep open.

This is the complete breakdown. Every major AI coding tool, what each tier costs, what it includes, and where the hidden costs live. Source links checked in May 2026. If you want to plug your own usage numbers in before you commit, run them through our AI cost calculator and you will get a per-month estimate across providers in a few seconds.

If you are comparing tools rather than just reading the sticker price, keep three companion pages open: the AI coding tools comparison matrix, the Claude Code vs Cursor vs Codex breakdown, and the Q2 2026 pricing update. This page is the broad reference. Those pages go deeper on tradeoffs, recent plan changes, and which tool fits which workflow.

Pricing Sources and Freshness

Pricing changes quickly, especially for tools that mix subscriptions, credits, premium model pools, and usage-based billing. Treat these as checked public prices, not permanent guarantees. For purchase decisions, verify the official pricing page before you buy.

For a narrower pricing-change view, use AI coding tools pricing in Q2 2026. For tool selection after budget, use best AI coding tools 2026.

Where Pricing Fits in the Decision Web

Pricing should be the second filter, not the first. Use the adjacent guides this way:

• Start with what an AI coding agent is if you are still separating autocomplete, IDE agents, terminal agents, and cloud agents.
• Use the comparison matrix when you need feature-by-feature tradeoffs.
• Use Claude Code vs Cursor vs Codex for the three-tool decision most teams actually make.
• Use Cursor vs Codex when the choice is IDE-native iteration versus OpenAI's agent stack.
• Use Anthropic vs OpenAI developer experience when the decision is really platform strategy, not editor choice.

That web prevents the common mistake: picking a cheaper plan for a workflow the tool was never built to handle.

Master Pricing Table

Now the details on every tool.

Claude Code

Claude Code is Anthropic's terminal-native AI agent. No IDE, no editor. It reads your entire codebase, edits files, runs commands, and operates autonomously across your whole project. The reasoning quality on complex tasks is the best in class. Start with what Claude Code is, then compare it against Cursor, Codex, and Aider if you are choosing a primary agent.

Pro ($20/mo): Access to Claude Code with Sonnet. Reasonable usage limits for light to moderate coding. You get the full experience: codebase-aware editing, multi-file changes, command execution. Start here if you are evaluating Claude Code for the first time.

Max ($100/mo): Higher usage limits and access to Opus-tier models. The reasoning quality jumps noticeably. Complex refactors, architectural decisions, and multi-step autonomous workflows all benefit from the stronger model. One developer tracked 10 billion tokens over 8 months at this tier. The same usage at API rates would have cost around $15,000.

Max ($200/mo): The highest individual tier. Effectively unlimited usage for daily coding. The sub-agent architecture, skills system, and autonomous loops are all included at every tier, but the $200 plan removes the friction of watching your usage. If you ship code every day, this plan pays for itself.

What you get at every tier: Full project context, multi-file editing, terminal command execution, MCP server integration, custom skills, memory system, parallel sub-agents. The difference between tiers is model quality and usage volume, not features.

Who it is for: Developers who want the strongest reasoning model applied to their entire codebase. Heavy users who run Claude Code for hours daily should go straight to $200 Max. Light users can start at $20 and upgrade when they hit limits.

More Claude Code reading: usage limits playbook, sub-agents, agent teams, and the setup guide.

Cursor

Cursor is a VS Code fork with AI built into every interaction. Inline completions, a chat panel, multi-file Composer edits, and an agent mode that runs commands and iterates on results.

Free tier: Limited completions and a small number of premium model requests per month. Enough to evaluate the workflow. You get the editor, basic completions, and a taste of Composer. Not enough for daily development.

Pro ($20/mo): Unlimited completions, generous premium model access, full Composer capabilities, and agent mode. This is the sweet spot for most developers. The velocity of iterating inside an IDE, seeing diffs in real time, and accepting changes line by line is hard to beat for UI work and incremental edits. See our Cursor Composer deep dive.

Pro+ ($60/mo): 3x the usage of Pro. Same features, higher limits. Worth it if you regularly hit rate limits on Pro and want to stay on a flat fee rather than dealing with overages.

Ultra ($200/mo): 20x the usage of Pro. Positioned for developers who use Cursor all day. Similar to Claude Max $200 in that it is designed to eliminate usage anxiety for power users.

Business ($40/mo per seat): Everything in Pro, plus admin controls, team management, centralized billing, and compliance features. The coding experience is identical to Pro. You are paying for organizational tooling.

Who it is for: Developers who prefer working inside an IDE with visual diffs and inline completions. The $20 Pro plan remains the best single-tool value in AI coding. For a detailed comparison with terminal-based tools, see Claude Code vs Cursor.

More Cursor reading: what Cursor is, Cursor AI code editor guide, Composer 2.0 deep dive, and Cursor vs Codex.

GitHub Copilot

GitHub Copilot is the most widely adopted AI coding tool. It lives inside VS Code, JetBrains, and Neovim. The latest version includes agent mode with terminal access and multi-file editing.

Free tier: 2,000 code completions and 50 premium chat requests per month. Available to everyone, not just students. If you qualify for the student/OSS tier, limits are higher.

Pro ($10/mo): Full completions, chat, and agent mode. Access to GPT-4o and Claude Sonnet models. The GitHub ecosystem integration is the differentiator. Copilot sees your issues, PRs, and CI results. When you reference a GitHub issue in a prompt, it pulls the full context automatically.

Business ($19/mo per seat): Everything in Pro, plus IP indemnity, organization-wide policy controls, audit logs, and the ability to exclude specific files from training. The IP protection alone makes this the default choice for companies with legal concerns about AI-generated code. Read our GitHub Copilot guide.

Enterprise ($39/mo per seat): Adds fine-tuned models trained on your organization's codebase, knowledge bases, and web search inside the editor.

Watch out: Advanced models like Opus consume 3x premium requests per use. If you rely on top-tier models, your effective request budget shrinks fast.

Who it is for: Teams already on GitHub. The ecosystem integration is unmatched. Individual developers get solid value at $10/mo, but the agent capabilities lag behind Cursor and Claude Code.

More Copilot reading: GitHub Copilot guide, Copilot coding agent CLI, premium requests explained, and migrating from Copilot to Claude Code.

Windsurf

Windsurf (formerly Codeium) has one of the most generous free tiers in the market. The Cascade agent chains multi-step operations together, and the editor handles TypeScript projects well.

Free tier: Generous autocomplete limits, access to Cascade agent mode, and a meaningful number of premium model requests. This is not a crippled trial. You can use Windsurf as your primary coding tool without paying for weeks or months. Tab completions are truly unlimited and cost no credits. For developers on a tight budget, this is the starting point.

Pro ($15/mo): About 1,000 prompts per month, faster response times, and priority access during peak usage. The $5 savings over Cursor Pro adds up to $60/year, and the free tier means you can evaluate thoroughly before committing.

Enterprise: Custom pricing with SSO, audit logs, and self-hosted deployment options.

Who it is for: Budget-conscious developers who want agent capabilities without paying $20/mo. The free tier is genuinely usable for real work. For head-to-heads with Cursor, see our Windsurf vs Cursor analysis and SWE-1 vs Cursor Composer comparison.

OpenAI Codex

OpenAI Codex brings OpenAI's coding models to the terminal and to cloud task execution. It follows the same CLI-agent pattern as Claude Code: read the project, reason about changes, execute them directly. For deeper context, read the OpenAI Codex guide, Codex vs Claude Code, and Claude Code vs Cursor vs Codex.

ChatGPT Plus ($20/mo): Codex access is bundled with ChatGPT Plus, according to OpenAI's Codex plan documentation. You get the CLI tool and cloud execution mode, which lets you kick off long-running tasks and check results later. Be aware: developers report that the Plus tier can be exhausted quickly on heavy coding sessions. The larger context and higher usage budgets are reasons to evaluate Pro or business plans.

ChatGPT Pro ($200/mo): Higher usage limits and more room for heavy coding sessions. Similar to Claude Max in positioning: designed for all-day usage. OpenAI's coding models have received positive reviews for TypeScript type inference and complex generic patterns.

ChatGPT Business: Codex is also included with ChatGPT Business. This is the missing middle tier for teams that need admin controls, workspace settings, and shared billing without jumping straight to a custom enterprise agreement. Business usage follows OpenAI's credit and token-based Codex rate card, so check the official Codex rate card before modeling team cost.

Enterprise/Edu: Custom pricing with workspace features, admin controls, and dedicated capacity.

Who it is for: Developers already paying for ChatGPT Plus who want a terminal agent without an additional subscription. The cloud execution mode is a unique feature. For a direct comparison, see Cursor vs Codex.

More Codex reading: Codex Cloud security playbook, Codex managed agents on AWS, Codex security research preview, and GPT-5 Codex.

Augment

Augment is a VS Code and JetBrains extension that focuses on large codebase understanding and structured planning. The Task List feature lets you review and edit a step-by-step plan before any code changes execute.

Dev plan (Free): Full access to Augment's core features including codebase indexing, chat, inline completions, and the Task List agent. Generous usage limits. Multi-model access including Claude and GPT-5.x. This is one of the most capable free tiers available because Augment is still in a growth phase and investing heavily in developer adoption.

Individual Pro ($50/mo): Higher usage limits, priority support, and access to additional models. The jump from free to $50 is steep, which means the free plan needs to be genuinely good to convert users. And it is.

Enterprise: Custom pricing with SSO, audit logs, and dedicated support. Team features for codebase-wide context sharing.

What makes it different: Augment indexes your entire codebase and maintains context across sessions in a way that most tools still struggle with. The Task List workflow gives you a review gate before the AI touches your code. For large monorepos and enterprise codebases, the context quality is a real differentiator.

Who it is for: Developers working on large codebases who want structured, reviewable AI assistance. The free tier makes it risk-free to try. If you work at a company with a 500K+ line codebase, Augment's context engine is worth evaluating. For the workflow angle, read the Augment Task List breakdown.

Gemini CLI

Gemini CLI is Google's terminal-based coding agent. It connects to Gemini 2.5 Pro with one of the largest context windows available.

Free: The entire tool is free. No paid tier for normal usage. It connects to your Google account and uses the Gemini API's free tier, which advertises 1,000 requests per day. In practice, most of those requests hit Gemini Flash (the lighter model). Some developers report rate-limiting on Gemini Pro after just 4 to 15 large prompts.

Antigravity ($20/mo Google One AI Premium): Google's browser-based IDE with Gemini integration. $20/mo gets you the Pro tier with weekly token budgets. There is a $250/mo Ultra tier but nothing in between, creating a pricing gap.

Google Cloud: For enterprise workloads, Gemini integrates with Vertex AI with its own token-based pricing. But for individual developers using the CLI, you pay nothing.

Who it is for: Every developer. There is no reason not to have it installed alongside your primary paid tool. Use it for high-volume tasks that do not justify burning premium credits: code review on large PRs, documentation generation, codebase analysis. See our Gemini CLI guide, best CLI tools for AI development, and Claude vs GPT coding comparison for broader model tradeoffs.

Zed

Zed is a Rust-native code editor built for speed. Sub-50ms latency, GPU-accelerated rendering, and built-in AI features.

Editor (Free): The editor itself is free and open source. Fast, minimal, and designed for developers who care about performance.

Zed AI ($20/mo): Adds AI completions, inline editing, and chat powered by multiple models. The integration is tighter than bolt-on extensions because AI is built into the editor's core architecture.

Who it is for: Performance-focused developers who want a modern editor that is not a VS Code fork. The $20/mo AI tier competes directly with Cursor Pro on price but offers a fundamentally different editing experience.

Related editor comparisons: Cursor AI guide, Windsurf vs Cursor, and the AI coding tools comparison matrix.

Kiro

Kiro is Amazon's AI coding tool that integrates with AWS services and uses a credit-based pricing system.

Free tier: Limited credits per month. Enough to evaluate the tool and run a few sessions.

Credit-based pricing: Different prompts cost different amounts depending on the model and complexity. Usage scales with your AWS billing. Developers have reported that credit consumption can be unpredictable, with bugs that drained limits unexpectedly during early access.

Who it is for: Teams deep in the AWS ecosystem who want AI coding integrated with their cloud workflow. The credit-based pricing makes it harder to predict monthly costs compared to flat-rate alternatives.

Devin

Devin is the fully autonomous software engineer. You assign tasks through Slack or a web interface, and it works independently: setting up environments, writing code, running tests, opening PRs.

Beta ($20/mo): Individual access to Devin's autonomous capabilities. This pricing is significantly lower than earlier per-task pricing, reflecting Cognition's push for adoption.

Team ($500/mo per seat): Dedicated Devin capacity for organizations that want to parallelize work across AI agents and human developers.

Who it is for: Teams with strong test coverage who want to delegate well-defined tasks. The $500/seat team pricing is a major commitment, but if Devin handles even a few features per month autonomously, the math works.

Related autonomous-agent reading: what an AI coding agent is, agent infrastructure tools, long-running agent harnesses, and AI agent frameworks compared.

App Builders: v0, Lovable, Bolt

These tools generate full applications from natural language descriptions. Different pricing model from coding assistants.

v0 (Vercel): Free tier with limited generations. Beyond that, a credit system where you pay per generation. Costs vary by complexity. Best for Next.js and shadcn/ui scaffolding.

Lovable: Free tier for one small project. Starter at $25/mo with more generations and the full template library. Best for MVPs and rapid product validation. See our look at the open-source alternative.

Bolt: Free tier with generous tokens. Pro at $25/mo for higher limits and faster generation. Best for browser-based prototyping with hands-on editing.

Who they are for: Developers validating product ideas quickly. Start with the free tiers and upgrade only when you have a specific project that benefits from rapid generation. For adjacent app-builder and UI workflows, read open-source Lovable alternatives, create beautiful UI with Claude Code, and building SaaS with Claude Code.

Cost Per Feature Analysis

Raw monthly cost does not tell the full story. Here is what each dollar actually buys across the tools that matter most for daily development.

Reasoning Quality Per Dollar

The pattern: at the $200/mo tier, every major tool offers effectively unlimited usage. The real differentiation happens at $20/mo, where usage caps force you to choose which tasks deserve premium AI and which get handled by free tools.

Context Window Per Dollar

Large codebase support varies dramatically by price tier.

Augment and Claude Code lead on context handling. Augment indexes your entire codebase and maintains that context across sessions. Claude Code loads your full project on every invocation. Codex context and credit behavior varies by ChatGPT plan and OpenAI's current rate card, which is why the Business tier matters for teams comparing Codex against seat-based tools.

Autonomy Per Dollar

How much can each tool do without you babysitting it?

High autonomy (can run for minutes to hours unsupervised): Claude Code ($20+), Codex ($20+), Devin ($20+)

Medium autonomy (multi-step with checkpoints): Cursor Agent ($20+), Augment Task List (Free), Windsurf Cascade (Free)

Low autonomy (mostly reactive): Copilot ($10+), Zed AI ($20), basic completions on any tool

If autonomous operation is your priority, Claude Code at $200/mo offers the best ratio of capability to cost. You can run multi-hour coding sessions with sub-agent orchestration and skills-based workflows. No other tool matches that depth of autonomous operation at any price.

What I Actually Pay

Here is the real cost of my daily development stack:

Claude Code handles the heavy lifting: autonomous refactors, multi-file changes, sub-agent orchestration, CI integration, and anything that benefits from deep reasoning. Cursor handles the fast iteration: UI tweaks, quick edits, visual diffs, and the work where IDE velocity matters more than raw intelligence. Augment's free tier fills a niche for large codebase navigation and structured planning. Gemini CLI handles high-volume code review and documentation at zero cost.

The $200 Max plan sounds expensive in isolation. In practice, it replaces hours of manual work every day. If you ship code professionally and your time is worth anything north of $50/hour, the math works within the first week.

Best Options by Budget

$0/mo: The Free Stack

Gemini CLI for terminal-based coding. Windsurf free tier for IDE work. Augment free tier for large codebase context. v0 free tier for UI generation.

This stack is genuinely usable. Gemini CLI's large context window handles codebase analysis. Windsurf's Cascade agent handles multi-step tasks. Augment adds structured planning with codebase-wide context. You can ship real projects without paying a cent. The tradeoff is reasoning quality on complex tasks and occasional rate limits during peak hours.

$10/mo: GitHub Ecosystem

Copilot Pro at $10/mo. The cheapest paid option with real agent capabilities. Best if your workflow is GitHub-centric and you want completions, chat, and basic agent mode without spending more.

$20/mo: Best Single Tool

Cursor Pro. The fastest AI coding environment for the money. Unlimited completions, full Composer, agent mode. If you can only pay for one tool, this is it.

Runner-up: Claude Code Pro at $20/mo if you prefer terminal-based workflows and stronger reasoning over IDE integration.

$40/mo: The Balanced Stack

Cursor Pro ($20) plus Claude Pro ($20). Cursor for fast iteration and visual editing. Claude Code for autonomous tasks, refactors, and anything that benefits from stronger reasoning. This combination covers nearly every coding workflow.

$220/mo: The Power User Stack

Claude Max ($200) plus Cursor Pro ($20). This is what heavy daily usage looks like. Claude Code runs for hours without usage anxiety. Cursor handles the quick edits and UI work. Add Augment (free) for codebase context and Gemini CLI (free) for high-volume tasks. This setup maximizes throughput for developers who ship code all day, every day.

$260/mo: Team Lead Stack

Add Copilot Business ($19/seat) for GitHub ecosystem integration and IP indemnity. Add Devin ($20/mo beta) for delegating well-defined tasks. At this budget, you are optimizing for team productivity, compliance, and the ability to parallelize work across human developers and AI agents.

Hidden Costs to Watch

Token overages on Cursor. Cursor Pro's usage limits depend heavily on which model you use. Higher-quality models burn through your allocation faster. Pro+ ($60/mo) and Ultra ($200/mo) exist specifically because Pro users kept hitting walls. Know your usage patterns before assuming $20/mo is enough.

Codex credit and context math. OpenAI's current Codex docs say Codex is included with Plus, Pro, Business, and Enterprise/Edu plans, but the practical budget depends on credits, model usage, and context needs. Do not treat $20/mo Plus as equivalent to a full team coding budget. If you work on large codebases or run long tasks, compare Plus, Pro, and Business using the Codex rate card.

Copilot model multipliers. Using Opus-tier models on Copilot consumes 3x your premium request allocation. Your "unlimited" plan is effectively one-third as generous when you use the best models.

Gemini CLI rate limiting. The "1,000 requests per day" mostly hits the lighter Flash model. Real Gemini Pro access can throttle after 4-15 large prompts. Guarantee Pro access by bringing your own API key, which adds API costs on top.

Kiro credit unpredictability. Variable credit costs per prompt make monthly budgeting difficult. AWS has acknowledged bugs that drained credits unexpectedly. Budget a 2x buffer over your expected usage until the system stabilizes.

API keys for extended features. Some tools let you bring your own API keys for additional models. This sounds flexible until you realize you are paying the tool's subscription plus raw API costs. Check whether the features you need are included in the plan or require separate API billing.

Team seat math. A $20/mo tool becomes $2,400/year for a 10-person team. Copilot Business at $19/seat is $2,280/year for the same team. Enterprise plans with custom pricing often include volume discounts that individual pricing pages do not show. Always ask for team quotes before multiplying the per-seat price.

Context window limits on cheaper plans. Lower tiers often restrict the number of files you can reference in a single prompt. If you work on large TypeScript projects with hundreds of files, the difference between a plan that loads 50 files and one that loads 200 files directly affects output quality.

Model access varies by tier. Claude Code at $20/mo gives you Sonnet. Opus-tier reasoning requires $100 or $200. Cursor Pro gives you access to premium models, but the specific models available change as partnerships shift. Do not assume the model you tried during a free trial is the same one you get on the cheapest paid plan.

The Bottom Line

The market has settled into clear tiers. Free tools (Gemini CLI, Windsurf, Augment Dev, v0) are good enough for real work. The $10-20/mo tier (Copilot Pro, Cursor Pro, Claude Pro, ChatGPT Plus with Codex) covers most developers. The $100-200/mo tier (Claude Max, Cursor Ultra, ChatGPT Pro with Codex) is for developers whose output directly generates revenue. Team plans like Copilot Business, Cursor Business, and ChatGPT Business sit between individual subscriptions and custom enterprise contracts.

Do not stack subscriptions you do not use daily. Pick one primary tool, add a free tier tool for overflow, and upgrade only when you consistently hit limits. The best pricing strategy is the one where every dollar spent maps to hours saved.

For recommendations on which tools to pick regardless of price, see our 10 best AI coding tools ranking. For head-to-head comparisons, check the tool comparison page, the agent comparison dashboard, the comparison hub, and the AI coding tools matrix.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does Claude Code cost?

Claude Code is available through Anthropic's subscription plans. The Pro plan costs $20/mo and includes Sonnet-level models. The Max plan at $100/mo adds Opus-tier reasoning and higher usage limits. The Max $200/mo plan offers effectively unlimited daily usage. There is no free tier. All plans include the full feature set: multi-file editing, terminal execution, sub-agents, skills, and memory.

Is Cursor free?

Cursor has a limited free tier with basic completions and a small number of premium model requests per month. It is enough to evaluate the tool but not enough for daily development. The Pro plan at $20/mo is what most developers use for real work. Higher tiers at $60/mo (Pro+) and $200/mo (Ultra) are available for heavier usage.

How much does GitHub Copilot cost?

GitHub Copilot Individual costs $10/mo or $100/year. The Business plan is $19/mo per seat. Enterprise is $39/mo per seat. There is a free tier with 2,000 completions and 50 premium requests per month. Students, teachers, and open-source maintainers get enhanced free access. Copilot is the cheapest paid option among major AI coding tools.

What is the best free AI coding tool?

For terminal work, Gemini CLI. For IDE work, Windsurf's free tier. For large codebase context, Augment's Dev plan. Each excels at different tasks. Using all three together gives you a genuinely capable free stack that covers most coding workflows.

Is Augment Code free?

Yes. Augment's Dev plan is free and includes codebase indexing, chat, inline completions, and the Task List agent with generous usage limits. The Individual Pro plan at $50/mo offers higher limits and priority support. The free tier is one of the most capable in the market because Augment is in a growth phase focused on developer adoption.

Cursor vs Claude Code: which is better value?

At $20/mo, they serve different workflows. Cursor Pro is the best value for IDE-based development with visual diffs and inline completions. Claude Code Pro is the best value for terminal-based autonomous coding with stronger reasoning. Many developers use both: Cursor for fast iteration, Claude Code for complex tasks. See our full comparison.

What is the cheapest AI coding tool worth paying for?

GitHub Copilot at $10/mo. You get completions, chat, and agent mode with GitHub ecosystem integration. If you need more capable agent features, Cursor Pro at $20/mo is the next step up and widely considered the best single-tool value at any price.

How much does Windsurf cost?

Windsurf's free tier is available to all individual developers with generous limits including unlimited tab completions. The Pro plan costs $15/mo for about 1,000 prompts per month and faster responses. Enterprise pricing is custom. Windsurf is the cheapest paid IDE option and has the strongest free tier among VS Code-fork editors.

Is OpenAI Codex free?

Codex access is bundled with paid ChatGPT plans, including Plus, Pro, Business, and Enterprise/Edu. There is no simple standalone "Codex free tier" to budget around. Plus is the entry point for individuals, Pro is the heavier individual plan, and Business is the team tier to evaluate before custom Enterprise/Edu. Always check OpenAI's Codex plan documentation and Codex rate card because credit rules changed in April 2026.

Decision Pages to Read Next

If this page answered "what does it cost?", these pages answer "which should I choose?":

• AI coding tools comparison matrix 2026 - broad feature and workflow comparison.
• Claude Code vs Cursor vs Codex - best next read for the core three-tool decision.
• Claude Code vs Cursor - terminal agent vs IDE-native workflow.
• Cursor vs Codex - IDE agent vs OpenAI terminal/cloud agent.
• Codex vs Claude Code - OpenAI vs Anthropic for autonomous coding.
• Windsurf vs Cursor - budget-friendly IDE agent vs the category leader.
• Aider vs Claude Code - open-source CLI workflow vs managed agent workflow.
• Best AI coding tools 2026 - ranking after you understand the pricing.

Do I need the $200/mo plan for any tool?

Only if you code for 4+ hours daily and the tool is your primary development environment. The $200 tiers on Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex are designed for professional developers who would otherwise hit rate limits constantly. If you code a few hours per week, the $20 tier on any tool is more than enough.

Related apps

• Agent Hub - One control panel for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, and 10+ AI coding harnesses. Desktop app for Mac.
• Cost Tape Cloud - Cloud cost tracking for AI agent runs. Cloud tier unlocks org-wide rollups, budgets, and alerts.

Related

• Subscribe to DevDigest on YouTube for hands-on walkthroughs