Anthropic Model Names Explained: Fable, Mythos, Opus, Sonnet

The Fable 5 Moment
31 parts- 1Claude Mythos 5 Explained: What It Is, Who Can Access It, and Why It's Gated
- 2Migrating to Claude Fable 5: The Practical Guide
- 3Claude Fable 5 Access After the June 22 Deadline: Where Things Stand
- 4Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol: Benchmarks, Pricing, and When Each Wins
- 5Fable 5 vs Opus 4.8: A Data-Driven Decision Guide for Engineering Teams
- 6How to Model Fable 5 Costs Before They Blow Up Your Budget
- 7Claude Fable 5 API: Production Integration Patterns, Rate Limits, and Migration Gotchas
- 8Handling Fable 5 Refusals: A Working Guide to the Fallback API
- 9Why Fable 5 Refuses Your Cybersecurity Queries (And How the Fallback Works)
- 10Fable 5's Hidden Guardrails: What Developers Need to Know About Silent Degradation
- 11Fable 5 Broke Enterprise ZDR Agreements: What Dev Teams Must Do Now
- 12Claude Managed Agents: Dreaming, Outcomes, and Multi-Agent Orchestration Explained
- 13Claude Managed Agents Public Beta: What's Actually Available vs What's Gated
- 14Dario Amodei Wants FAA-Style AI Regulation: Open Questions for Developers
- 15The Exponential and the Working Developer: Sitting With Amodei's Hardest Questions
- 16The Dario Paradox: Warning About the Exponential While Shipping It
- 17The Pushback on Amodei's Exponential Essay: Too Slow, Too Convenient, or About Right?
- 18Fable 5 Before June 22: The Decision Checklist for Every Plan Tier
- 19Fable 5 on AWS Bedrock: When Your Data Leaves the AWS Boundary
- 20Why Claude Desktop Installs a 1.8 GB Hyper-V VM on Windows
- 21Anthropic Model Names Explained: Fable, Mythos, Opus, SonnetCurrent
- 22Managed Agents vs LangGraph vs Rolling Your Own: Who Should Run Your Agent Loop in 2026
- 23Claude Usage Limits With Fable 5: Windows and Burn Rates
- 24Fable 5 for Government and Regulated Teams: The GovCloud Question
- 25Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4: The Cost-Quality Gap Measured in Real Tasks
- 26Fable 5 Orchestrator Playbook: Smart Model, Cheap Workers
- 27Prompt Caching Economics on Fable 5: When the 5-Minute TTL Pays
- 28Fable 5 with 1M Context: What Actually Works in Practice
- 29Claude Effort Levels Explained: Fable 5, Opus 5.5, Haiku 5.5
- 30Fable 5 Effort Levels vs Switching Models: When to Dial and When to Change
- 31Recursive Self-Improvement: What Fable 5, Dario's Essay, and Anthropic's Own Data Actually Tell Us
TL;DR
Anthropic's model names: Haiku, Sonnet, Opus, then Fable and Mythos. What each tier means, the current model IDs and prices, and which one to pick.
Last updated: October 9, 2026 - Haiku 5.5 (released October 7) replaces Haiku 4.5 in the current lineup; table, model IDs, prices and FAQ re-verified against Anthropic's models overview.
Anthropic names Claude models by tier and version: Haiku is the fastest and cheapest, Sonnet balances speed and intelligence, and Opus handles long-running agentic coding and knowledge work. Fable is a newer named tier above Opus, and Mythos is the class it belongs to. Anthropic describes Fable 5 as "a Mythos-class model that we've made safe for general use", while Mythos models themselves have limited availability. As of October 9, 2026, the current lineup is Fable 5.1, Opus 5.5, Sonnet 5.5, and Haiku 5.5.
Official Sources#
| Source | What it covers |
|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5 and Mythos 5 announcement | The launch, the Mythos-class definition, safeguards, launch pricing |
| Claude models overview | Current model IDs, context windows, defaults, retirement dates |
| Claude API pricing | Per-model token rates, including limited-availability Mythos models |
| Sam Wilkinson's model naming extrapolation | The satirical table that made the naming a talking point |
| Hacker News discussion | Community reaction (320 points as of September 28) |
The old ladder#
For most of Claude's public history, the naming system fit in a README comment: Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus, ordered by capability and cost, each with a version number. Claude 3 Opus, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Claude 4 Opus told you the capability class and how recent the model was.
What Mythos and Fable changed#
With Claude Fable 5, launched June 9, 2026, Anthropic introduced a named class above Opus. Per the announcement, Fable 5 is a Mythos-class model made safe for general use, with safeguards that send queries on some topics to Claude Opus 4.8 instead (Anthropic says they trigger in less than 5% of sessions on average). Claude Mythos 5 is the same underlying model with the safeguards lifted in some areas, initially deployed through Project Glasswing for cyberdefenders. Anthropic's pricing page still lists Mythos models as limited availability.
So the model name and the class name are different things. claude-fable-5-1 does not contain the word Mythos, because Mythos is the capability class and Fable is the generally available flagship inside it. That separation lets Anthropic ship a general-use model and a restricted-access sibling from the same underlying weights.
Current model tiers#
From Anthropic's models overview, checked October 9, 2026:
| Name | API model ID | Input (per 1M) | Output (per 1M) | Context | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | claude-fable-5-1 | $10 | $50 | 1M tokens | Demanding reasoning and long-horizon agentic work |
| Claude Opus 5.5 | claude-opus-5-5 | $4 | $20 | 1M tokens | Long-running agentic coding and knowledge work; Anthropic's suggested starting point for most workloads |
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | claude-sonnet-5-5 | $2 | $10 | 1M tokens | The best combination of speed and intelligence |
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | claude-haiku-5-5 | From $0.10 | From $0.50 | 1M tokens | Fast, cost-efficient, high-volume work and subagents |
Older models such as Fable 5, Opus 5, Opus 4.8, and Sonnet 5 remain available as legacy models. Anthropic's guidance is to start with Opus 5.5 for most workloads, use Fable 5.1 for demanding reasoning and long-horizon agentic work or when your evals on Opus 5.5 at higher effort still fall short, and pick a cheaper tier when evals show quality holds. The tier also changes the default effort setting, so see Fable 5 effort levels explained before comparing runs across models.
What the naming signals#
Names are roadmap signals, and the June questions have mostly answered themselves. There is a Fable 5.1, so named models do get point releases. There are Mythos 5 and Mythos 5.1, so the class holds more than one model. Opus did not stop at 4.x: it moved to Opus 5 and Opus 5.5, and it is now priced below the Opus 4.x models it replaced ($4 input and $20 output for Opus 5.5 versus $5 and $25). The takeaway is that price bands and model IDs are more reliable than the tier names themselves, so read the models overview instead of inferring capability from a name.
How to choose now#
- Start with the tier Anthropic recommends for your kind of work and move up only when your evals fail. See Fable 5 vs Opus 4.8: when to use which and the Opus 5 vs Opus 4.8 vs Fable 5 comparison.
- Model the cost per completed task, not per token. See Fable 5 production cost modeling and the cost-per-task analysis.
- Pin the exact model ID in production. Anthropic states every Claude model ID is a pinned snapshot, so you control when upgrades happen.
- If you are moving from older Claude models, the migration checklist for Fable 5 lists the breaking changes.
- For the whole family on one page, see the Claude tool page; for how it stacks up against OpenAI's lineup, see Claude vs ChatGPT.
FAQ#
What is Claude Mythos?#
Mythos is Anthropic's top capability class, above Opus. Claude Fable 5 is described as a Mythos-class model made safe for general use, while Mythos 5 and Mythos 5.1 have safeguards lifted in some areas and are limited-availability models.
What is the difference between Fable and Mythos?#
Per the launch announcement, Mythos 5 is the same underlying model as Fable 5 with the safeguards lifted in some areas. Fable is the generally available model, and Mythos is offered to a small group of cyberdefenders and infrastructure providers under trusted access.
Which Claude model should I use for coding?#
Anthropic's models overview describes Opus 5.5 as built for long-running agentic coding and recommends starting there for most workloads. Move to Fable 5.1 for the most demanding long-horizon work, or down to Sonnet 5.5 for a faster and cheaper tier once your evals show quality holds.
What model IDs should I use in API calls?#
Use the IDs from the models overview: claude-fable-5-1, claude-opus-5-5, claude-sonnet-5-5, and claude-haiku-5-5. Every Claude model ID is a pinned snapshot, so pin the exact ID in production.
How much does each Claude tier cost?#
Per million tokens: Fable 5.1 is $10 input and $50 output, Opus 5.5 is $4 and $20, Sonnet 5.5 is $2 and $10, and Haiku 5.5 starts at $0.10 and $0.50 (listed as "from" prices; the rate rises for prompts over 100,000 tokens, see the Haiku 5.5 guide). Prompt cache reads and batch requests are cheaper, per Anthropic's pricing page.
Continue Reading#
- Claude Haiku 5.5: Pricing, Migration Changes, and When to Use It - the newest tier and its pricing cliff
- Fable 5 Effort Levels Explained - how effort changes token use and cost across models
- Claude Fable 5 vs Opus 4.8: When to Use Which - the tier decision in detail
- Claude Code Fast Mode: When 2.5x Speed Is Worth 2x Price - the other lever on speed and cost
- Apple's LanguageModel Protocol: Xcode 27 Just Made Model Lock-In Optional
Get the next deep dive like this in your inbox
One email a week on anthropic and the rest of the AI dev stack. Free.
Read next on Claude Code
Claude Fable 5 Access After the June 22 Deadline: Where Things Stand
Claude Fable 5 access after the June 22 free window closed on Pro, Max, Team and Enterprise plans: what credits cost now and how to control Fable 5 spend.
6 min readFable 5 vs Opus 4.8: A Data-Driven Decision Guide for Engineering Teams
Fable 5 posts an 80.3% SWE-Bench Pro score and costs 2x Opus 4.8 - here is the task-profile scoring guide that tells you when the premium pays off.
7 min readMigrating to Claude Fable 5: The Practical Guide
Migrating to Claude Fable 5 from Opus 4.8 or older models - every breaking change, what to delete from your code, and the prompt audit to run before switching.
9 min readTechnical content at the intersection of AI and development. Building with AI agents, Claude Code, and modern dev tools - then showing you exactly how it works.








